Sendero
01-19-2005, 11:42 AM
I stumbled on this intake while browsing through Ford's Racing Parts websites and noticed its similarities with the Aviator intake. If I'm not mistaken this "type" of intake is also used on the 5.0L Cammer motor.
http://www.fordracingparts.com/images/part/full/M9424T46.jpg
1996-98 MUSTANG COBRA INTAKE MANIFOLD ASSEMBLY (http://www.fordracingparts.com/parts/part_details.asp?PartKeyField=3816)
INTAKE KIT ENGINE MANAGEMENT COMPUTER (http://www.fordracingparts.com/parts/part_details.asp?PartKeyField=6525) (Required for 96-97 Cobra's)
I'm interested to see some dyno numbers and/or a comparison with the popular short runner intake modifications. I know this isn't a "cure all" for the B-Heads low end short comings, but if it increases low end torque up to at least a Mach 1 level then its worth a look. (if it can be had significantly cheaper than the retail pricing on the website!) Without making the comparison of Apples to Wing Nuts, how does the torque curve of the Aviator compare to the B-Headed Cobra. (I know they are different animals, just looking for "its got a decent bottom end" type of response). Any downfalls to this intake?
http://www.fordracingparts.com/images/part/full/M9424T46.jpg
1996-98 MUSTANG COBRA INTAKE MANIFOLD ASSEMBLY (http://www.fordracingparts.com/parts/part_details.asp?PartKeyField=3816)
INTAKE KIT ENGINE MANAGEMENT COMPUTER (http://www.fordracingparts.com/parts/part_details.asp?PartKeyField=6525) (Required for 96-97 Cobra's)
I'm interested to see some dyno numbers and/or a comparison with the popular short runner intake modifications. I know this isn't a "cure all" for the B-Heads low end short comings, but if it increases low end torque up to at least a Mach 1 level then its worth a look. (if it can be had significantly cheaper than the retail pricing on the website!) Without making the comparison of Apples to Wing Nuts, how does the torque curve of the Aviator compare to the B-Headed Cobra. (I know they are different animals, just looking for "its got a decent bottom end" type of response). Any downfalls to this intake?