PDA

View Full Version : 94 Ford Mustang GT Bama Baby


donfordman30
01-12-2007, 10:19 AM
Here's from the new guy.

94 Ford Mustng GT Bolts on are
1.7 Roller Rockers
Mac unequal length headers
x-pipe
Flow masters
C@L 76 MM Mass
70 MM Throttle body
MSD 6AL
75 Shot ZEX Nitrous kit
Diablo Sport Chip flip 2 stage for timing of nitrous.

My Jpeg is to large to post

360 RWHP
399 fOOT Pounds of torque

QWKSNKE
01-12-2007, 10:22 AM
those are really good numbers on a 75 shot with minmal motor mods

SvoBrown
01-12-2007, 01:37 PM
Very good #'s. Make me want to rethink my project.

hevymtl
01-12-2007, 06:08 PM
You got any pics? Nice numbers!

donfordman30
01-12-2007, 09:13 PM
Don't all stang fans have pics. Check these out.

donfordman30
01-12-2007, 09:18 PM
Her's a few more of my stang and my buddy.

TheJeanyus
01-12-2007, 09:56 PM
Great looking car - now lower that bad boy!

NightHawk756
01-13-2007, 05:52 AM
those are really good numbers on a 75 shot with minmal motor mods

+1!!! :chug:

Especially when my car only made 198/267 with exhaust. That's a big jump for the mods.

donfordman30
01-13-2007, 06:42 AM
I just lowered her last week with a set of Eibach spings with upper and lower comp engineering polly isolators and it now no longer looks like a 4 wheel drive. I'm going to put a set of Tokico HP shocks and struts on it next week. Has anyone ever used those?? I'm torn between those and the KYB'S. hUMM

donfordman30
01-13-2007, 06:46 AM
Before the tune with the diablo with the bolt on I had my run what you brung was 157rwhp then with some tuning and the chip installed the dyno read 265.4 on just motor. That's right 108.4 with just adding the diablo with the mods. The very near future plans is either a set of AFR 185, Comp Cam and Trick Flow intake. Around 2200.00 or just go with a Kenne Belle with the stock heads adding a Comp Cam and seeing what I get. 3400.00??? Humm what to do.

1320snake
01-14-2007, 01:41 PM
boost-boost-boost

donfordman30
01-14-2007, 01:45 PM
Some how I knew you were going to say that. :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :drool:

89 Hoss
01-14-2007, 03:20 PM
Sweet car and love that color. If mine would have had that kind of power I would have kept it.

donfordman30
01-14-2007, 05:48 PM
Thanks, But it wasn't cheap getting that HP with out changing heads and intake or cam. Just lucky to pull these numbers from this one. But is dyno proven. I don't think I can complain. Other then the AODE Tranny. .

Italian LX
01-15-2007, 06:40 AM
Before the tune with the diablo with the bolt on I had my run what you brung was 157rwhp then with some tuning and the chip installed the dyno read 265.4 on just motor. That's right 108.4 with just adding the diablo with the mods.
I'm sorry dude, but I'm just not buying that. There is no way in hell of getting 265 to the wheels on a very lightly modded '94 GT... especially through an auto.

:shake:

donfordman30
01-15-2007, 02:40 PM
It's your choice to believe it or not. I have the dyno sheets and also have a buddy that is a member on here that was there. I don't have a blown motor I'm trying to say has 700 horses. It's just a GT that has very exceptional power for a stock motor with Mod's just proud that's all. How do I shrink down my Mod sheet from 1.04mb to 97.7 kb to post? I can show that to you if you don't believe. :puff: :chug:

TheJeanyus
01-15-2007, 04:41 PM
Where was it dynoed?

donfordman30
01-15-2007, 04:56 PM
Strategic Performance in Cordova Alabama on a Mustang Dyno meter by Ron Willis.

TheJeanyus
01-16-2007, 01:16 AM
I suspected it was a Mustang dyno. I bet he doesn't have the load calculations set correctly, resulting in higher numbers.

donfordman30
01-16-2007, 03:38 AM
470 rwhp, 507 rwtq Yea I'm sure yours wasn't done right either. Mine is probably off by 100 I'm sure. :puff:

Italian LX
01-16-2007, 05:24 AM
Dude, we're not trying to knock your numbers. We're trying to give you a clue that what you think you have is not really what you're putting down.

I'd hate to see you drop $2000 on an H/C/I and see that you only gained 20rwhp from it.

QWKSNKE
01-16-2007, 10:51 AM
I suspected it was a Mustang dyno. I bet he doesn't have the load calculations set correctly, resulting in higher numbers.

I could see that.

If everything is correct you are putting down more than AODE cars with H/C/I swaps

donfordman30
01-16-2007, 11:37 AM
Thanks guys. I was only going by what the Dyno sheet said. I do know that I can stomp the shit out of a 2005-2007 GT without mods with no juice. The juice is just for fun. :hyper:

TheJeanyus
01-16-2007, 12:56 PM
470 rwhp, 507 rwtq Yea I'm sure yours wasn't done right either. Mine is probably off by 100 I'm sure. :puff:
I'm not trying to be offensive. I've heard of shops with Mustang dynos either having it calibrated wrong or having a "happy customer" button where they'll change the calibration after a mod to make the numbers higher.

coupe
01-16-2007, 01:29 PM
In this day and age (and location) the good 'ol dynojet is pretty much the standard.

But the numbers on the auto did sound a bit optimistic. Maybe the car has just the right converter, gears, and some transmission work. :shrug:

QWKSNKE
01-16-2007, 02:14 PM
In this day and age (and location) the good 'ol dynojet is pretty much the standard.

But the numbers on the auto did sound a bit optimistic. Maybe the car has just the right converter, gears, and some transmission work. :shrug:

Only thing that could fudge the numbers like that would be the converter. That is very possible if the car in question has a higher than stock stall on it.

Gears and other tranny work will not affect the dyno #'s

donfordman30
01-16-2007, 03:20 PM
Now I didn't mention anything about the drivetrain on this car. I just stated motor mods. The car does have an Art-Carr built transmission with a FRPP 2200-2800 Stall and 3.73 gears with posi spool. Rear upper and lower control arms. The dyno run was done with the converter locked. Could the converter being locked have caused the high numbers? There is several other mods to the car but no HCI Combo. Opened valve covers to install 1.7 roller rockers and a 1/2 intake spacer for heat. :wall96:

1320snake
01-16-2007, 09:27 PM
hey need to find a local dyno-jet see how numbers compare from what I hear if its right you will see even better numbers????

SvoBrown
01-17-2007, 01:59 AM
I have been on 3 dyno's, The Z1 motorsports gave more HP at a lower boost than the last dyno day I went to with SS.
Lee, with a lower rear gear, will that show more torque?

TheJeanyus
01-17-2007, 02:46 AM
I've always heard a lower gear will show less torque and horsepower due to the additional loss of energy that comes from a higher mechanical advantage.

QWKSNKE
01-17-2007, 05:04 AM
I have been on 3 dyno's, The Z1 motorsports gave more HP at a lower boost than the last dyno day I went to with SS.
Lee, with a lower rear gear, will that show more torque?

no. it will not affect your torque numbers.

natedawgg94
02-01-2007, 12:20 PM
i've got pretty much same setup except pro m 80mm MAF and no NOS in a 5 speed. i'd love to see those numbers by just adding a 75 shot.