Scothew
05-24-2007, 09:02 AM
Why is a file with a .jpeg extension can be 193k for attachment and one with .jpg extension is only 143k.
I know I use .jpg more thans than not and never really use .jpeg, I would have thought the sizes would have been reveresed or the same.
Just an observation I just ran across.
I know I use .jpg more thans than not and never really use .jpeg, I would have thought the sizes would have been reveresed or the same.
Just an observation I just ran across.