Quote:
Originally Posted by Cougar5.0
Dude, you were the one hacking away at the C&L meter with little substance to your arguments.
|
Really? Four back to back tests over two months with 1500+ miles datalogged and two trips to the dyno using different MAF Transfers and tuning parameters with help from numerous other tuners isn't substance. Damn! Excuse me if I don't regurgetate the entire tuning history of my vehicle in every post.
Quote:
|
Don't blame me if I have a different view of the meter.
|
Nobody did. You blamed
me for my lack a ability to
make it work even though it was the wrong choice for my application. Then injected that "hundreds of others" have no problems so it must be my issue and called Straw Man on my rebuttal. You beat me to the Straw Man I believe. I'm still trying to find where I bad mouthed C&L, really I am.
Quote:
|
If you don't need a larger meter, then don't bother with it - but don't blame the C&L for issues that many of us do not have or if we did have, found that it was not the meter but something else.
|
Burden of Proof is on you then. Scothew experienced the
same problems with the
same meter; so has other 96-98 Cobra owners on Corral, SVTPerformance, and Stangnet. Keep in mind I'm only talking about EEC-V LLX3-4/AOL3 applications not EEC-IV A9x applications, which is what my recommendations above were gear towards. I could agree with your statements if I said "all C&L's have decel stalling issues", but that's not what I said is it?
But that's whats good about the internet, everybody has an opinion.