01-28-2006, 11:58 PM | #41 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MI Mental Health Dept
Posts: 182
|
Re: New Binary Editor
Quote:
__________________
Ryan J McCormick Parts replacement is not auto repair, if you can't diagnose, don't open the hood! |
|
01-29-2006, 10:13 AM | #42 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 48
|
Re: New Binary Editor
Quote:
e.g. 2.73's, 3.35 1st gear ratio, 25.6" diameter tire. MPH @ 1000RPM - 8.4MPH, 2000RPM - 16.8MPH, 3000RPM - 25.2MPH N/V @ 2000RPM = 119, @ 2000RPM = 119, @3000RPM = 119 TTNOV is there so that the ECU can determine if the vehicle is in 1st gear (or not). If it is, FN1119 spark reduction is applied. N/V in second gear is 69. For this example above, you could set TTNOV at, say 100 & the FN1119 would thus pull timing in first, but not second. If N > TTNOV * VSBAR (avg speed) then apply FN1119 - 'C', else 'C' = 0 Spark formula; SAF = Y * ['S' + B - C + FN1133(ECT, LOAD)] +KPS1 Notice how 'C', the torque truncation spark table, FN1119, is subtracted from the calculated spark? This table will be applied any time TTNOV is set low enough that when multiplied by the rolling average speed of the car, it is smaller than the engine RPM at that speed. |
|
01-29-2006, 11:55 AM | #43 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sacramento California
Posts: 449
|
Re: New Binary Editor
Quote:
sailorbob Nice find!!!
__________________
EEC Analyzer A9M, TwEECer, 306ci, 73mm C&L w Tuner Tube, Cobra Intake, 42# inj, Edelbrock 6037, E303 cam, 155 fuel pump, FPR, 70mm TB, E-Fan, 3.55 gears, Powerdyne 9psi actual 5psi...way more. |
|
01-29-2006, 03:12 PM | #44 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 48
|
Re: New Binary Editor
Quote:
|
|
01-29-2006, 07:00 PM | #45 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 48
|
Re: New Binary Editor
Well, I was able to create a tune where I just generated the constants in TunerPro & then copied all the functions from a known good tune in TwEECer. The car started & ran fine but I still can't get Calcon to cooperate - 1/3 of the parameters are garbage now. I'm annoyed at this point.
|
01-29-2006, 07:51 PM | #46 | |
5.0 Block/Walnut Cracker
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Working....
Posts: 2,409
|
Re: New Binary Editor
Quote:
__________________
'14 Dodge Challenger SRT8 392 6-speed |
|
01-29-2006, 09:52 PM | #47 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sacramento California
Posts: 449
|
Re: New Binary Editor
Quote:
Which binary did you start with? are you sure it was the A9L and not the X3Z or vise versa?
__________________
EEC Analyzer A9M, TwEECer, 306ci, 73mm C&L w Tuner Tube, Cobra Intake, 42# inj, Edelbrock 6037, E303 cam, 155 fuel pump, FPR, 70mm TB, E-Fan, 3.55 gears, Powerdyne 9psi actual 5psi...way more. |
|
01-29-2006, 10:22 PM | #48 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MI Mental Health Dept
Posts: 182
|
Re: New Binary Editor
Quote:
4.10's, 2.40 1st gear ratio, 28.88" diameter tire. Speed calc done with EEC Analyzer 2.7.0.0 1000RPM = 9MPH, 2000RPM = 17MPH, 3000RPM = 26MPH, 4000RPM = 35MPH, 5000RPM = 44MPH N/V @ 1000RPM = 111, @ 2000RPM = 117, @ 3000RPM = 115, @ 4000RPM = 114 , @ 5000 - 113
__________________
Ryan J McCormick Parts replacement is not auto repair, if you can't diagnose, don't open the hood! |
|
01-29-2006, 10:34 PM | #49 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sacramento California
Posts: 449
|
Re: New Binary Editor
fireguy it could be because of rounding. The difference between the 111 and 117 at 2000 RPM is 1MPH.
__________________
EEC Analyzer A9M, TwEECer, 306ci, 73mm C&L w Tuner Tube, Cobra Intake, 42# inj, Edelbrock 6037, E303 cam, 155 fuel pump, FPR, 70mm TB, E-Fan, 3.55 gears, Powerdyne 9psi actual 5psi...way more. |
01-29-2006, 11:04 PM | #50 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 48
|
Re: New Binary Editor
Quote:
Filling the MAF and tracking the changes, the flow rates below point 16 (15 & under) will show up as a change in 1 byte at an appropriate address and changes to two bytes at very low numbered addresses. For example, if I change Y axis cell #15 to "100", I get address 6E20 filled with 3E (versus 1D with the stock value of "90") but address 003C & 003D are also changed from the original values. Seems odd that 3 bytes are changed for these fields. Change all the X axis cells, you'll get something with a ton of low address cells filled, but most of which are associated with another function all together? Seems messed up to me and my engine surely woudn't run with this so something is wrong... Note: A/C Time Delay vs TP (FN087) will write to the same addresses as MAF Transfer starting at 0000 - seems odd to me... A/C Flow Max vs RPM is doing the same thing starting at 000C & EGR Desired Drop vs Flow starting at 0014. For example, change FN087 Y-axis point 6 & do a "difference tool" & then change MAF Function FN036 Y-axis point 16 & watch how the value in address 0000 changes. Something seems to be misaligned somewhere... |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|