[Topic split]Dyno numbers - Page 2

QWKSNKE · 08-01-2005, 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wall96cobra

Well he did say go with a performer RPM 2 or the systemax so if you got the performer then your plate would work right?

I think the ports are larger on the rpm 2.

slvrbullit · 08-01-2005, 09:03 PM

Plus the RPM II looks like shit.

08-02-2005, 04:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slvrbullit

Plus the RPM II looks like shit.

but it works like crazy

Shankin · 08-02-2005, 06:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by qkjuicedpony

but it works like crazy

Very true. We dynoed a 306 daily driver with afr 185s,rpm2 intake and custom cam and it made 342.

coupe · 08-02-2005, 08:19 AM

I think there's power left with keeping the RPM/typhoon. It's been port-matched, has nicely angled runners into the heads, and seems to work well throughout the range. I would avoid the Systemax because it is so huge and cumbersome... I don't think it clears SLVRBULLIT's tall valve covers either.

The nitrous will make up for any inefficiencies in the typhoon

Shankin · 08-02-2005, 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coupe

I think there's power left with keeping the RPM/typhoon. It's been port-matched, has nicely angled runners into the heads, and seems to work well throughout the range. I would avoid the Systemax because it is so huge and cumbersome... I don't think it clears SLVRBULLIT's tall valve covers either.

The nitrous will make up for any inefficiencies in the typhoon

Hell yeah! Spray it!

Disney Lincoln · 08-03-2005, 12:32 AM

The Typhoon may be able to make more power than it currently is, but it's never going to be able to match the power of a Systemax or RPM II. If you want more NA power, then go ahead and start planning on one of those now. I would go for the RPM II since it will need less work out of the box than the Holley will.

Shankin is right, get teh MAF, power pipe, intake and some more tuning and it should put down closer to 350-360. Assuming the heads are up to it.

08-01-2005, 09:03 PM	#12
slvrbullit Super Moderator Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: on the water Posts: 1,280	Re: Dyno numbers Plus the RPM II looks like shit. __________________ 2012 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited--- too many mods to list, about to be sitting on 1 ton axles. 2000 Ford F-350 Dually Lariat LE Crew Cab Short Box 7.3 auto 168,000 miles

08-02-2005, 08:19 AM	#15
coupe Super Moderator Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 6,313	Re: Dyno numbers I think there's power left with keeping the RPM/typhoon. It's been port-matched, has nicely angled runners into the heads, and seems to work well throughout the range. I would avoid the Systemax because it is so huge and cumbersome... I don't think it clears SLVRBULLIT's tall valve covers either. The nitrous will make up for any inefficiencies in the typhoon __________________ " If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. " - Albert Einstein

08-03-2005, 12:32 AM	#17
Disney Lincoln Senior Member Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 290	Re: [Topic split]Dyno numbers The Typhoon may be able to make more power than it currently is, but it's never going to be able to match the power of a Systemax or RPM II. If you want more NA power, then go ahead and start planning on one of those now. I would go for the RPM II since it will need less work out of the box than the Holley will. Shankin is right, get teh MAF, power pipe, intake and some more tuning and it should put down closer to 350-360. Assuming the heads are up to it.