ran a 13.068 with a merily stock gt stang

mrmustangconvert · 11-13-2006, 03:56 PM

i dont know if you can read it but it says:

r/t .633

60' 1.732

1/8 8.307 mph 82.22

1/4 13.068 mph 102.76

but the only things that i have done so far is cold air intake exaust and 4:30 gears with bfg drag radials

ChipR4cam · 11-13-2006, 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmustangconvert

i dont know if you can read it but it says:

r/t .633

60' 1.732

1/8 8.307 mph 82.22

1/4 13.068 mph 102.76

but the only things that i have done so far is cold air intake exaust and 4:30 gears with bfg drag radials

Saweet. That's some nice driving man.

04 Mach1 · 11-13-2006, 05:04 PM

Congrats Cletis told me about it today.

keelay · 11-13-2006, 05:21 PM

wtf? who is cletis???
btw ill take the credit for the driving!!!! and that was my first time driving a sub 2.0 sixty foot

04 Mach1 · 11-13-2006, 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keelay

wtf? who is cletis???
btw ill take the credit for the driving!!!! and that was my first time driving a sub 2.0 sixty foot

B!tch your Cletis

TheJeanyus · 11-13-2006, 05:27 PM

1.7 60' on DR's - nice!

keelay · 11-13-2006, 06:13 PM

its spelled cletus, btw.

coupe · 11-14-2006, 07:27 AM

Impressive...those 4.30's must be perfect for that car. Was it in 5th crossing the line?

keelay · 11-14-2006, 05:14 PM

nah, but close. i got curious about how far the limiter was past the 1/4 mark, and about 100' after the finish it hits the rev limiter.

im thinking that 4.10's would pick it up better on the top end, and allow a higher launch rpm w/o blowing the d/r's away. plus on down the road when its quicker ie: mid 12's and below, you woulndnt have to hit fifth, its a win/win situation imo. what you guys think???

Wickd GT · 11-19-2006, 06:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keelay

nah, but close. i got curious about how far the limiter was past the 1/4 mark, and about 100' after the finish it hits the rev limiter.

im thinking that 4.10's would pick it up better on the top end, and allow a higher launch rpm w/o blowing the d/r's away. plus on down the road when its quicker ie: mid 12's and below, you woulndnt have to hit fifth, its a win/win situation imo. what you guys think???

I say this, if you have to put it on fith gear, which is a cruising gear, the set up is wrong! If you guys are going to stay with the 4:30 gears then need to tune the computer to raise the rev limiter or go to 4:10 gears. If not get a taller tire, a 28" slick.

Edgar

11-13-2006, 03:56 PM	#1
mrmustangconvert Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: at your moms Posts: 407	ran a 13.068 with a merily stock gt stang i dont know if you can read it but it says: r/t .633 60' 1.732 1/8 8.307 mph 82.22 1/4 13.068 mph 102.76 but the only things that i have done so far is cold air intake exaust and 4:30 gears with bfg drag radials __________________ 13.068 @ 102 with a 1.732 60 ft, 4:30 gears and drag radials, 2.5 inch exaust, x pipe w/ flowmasters, stock motor and trans

11-13-2006, 05:21 PM	#4
keelay Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: glencoe alabama Posts: 70	wtf? who is cletis??? btw ill take the credit for the driving!!!! and that was my first time driving a sub 2.0 sixty foot __________________ '03 sentra se-r spec v 14.1 @98mph '03 sentra se-r (auto) 15.4 '84 cutlass 355 rocket (the toy) grave yard: 98 gt vert 92 ranger 2.3 (resurrected with a vengeance!) 86 buick century station wagon 92 buick regal

11-13-2006, 05:27 PM	#6
TheJeanyus Administrator Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Huntsville, AL Posts: 14,774	1.7 60' on DR's - nice! __________________ 1998 Mustang GT Coupe - World's Slowest Racecar 2005 Toyota 4Runner SR5 V8 2013 Volkswagen Jetta Sportwagen TDI

11-13-2006, 06:13 PM	#7
keelay Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: glencoe alabama Posts: 70	its spelled cletus, btw. __________________ '03 sentra se-r spec v 14.1 @98mph '03 sentra se-r (auto) 15.4 '84 cutlass 355 rocket (the toy) grave yard: 98 gt vert 92 ranger 2.3 (resurrected with a vengeance!) 86 buick century station wagon 92 buick regal

11-14-2006, 07:27 AM	#8
coupe Super Moderator Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 6,313	Impressive...those 4.30's must be perfect for that car. Was it in 5th crossing the line? __________________ " If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. " - Albert Einstein

11-13-2006, 05:04 PM	#3
04 Mach1 Bet I red light B4U Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: ANNISTON, AL Posts: 975	Congrats Cletis told me about it today.

11-14-2006, 05:14 PM	#9
keelay Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: glencoe alabama Posts: 70	nah, but close. i got curious about how far the limiter was past the 1/4 mark, and about 100' after the finish it hits the rev limiter. im thinking that 4.10's would pick it up better on the top end, and allow a higher launch rpm w/o blowing the d/r's away. plus on down the road when its quicker ie: mid 12's and below, you woulndnt have to hit fifth, its a win/win situation imo. what you guys think??? __________________ '03 sentra se-r spec v 14.1 @98mph '03 sentra se-r (auto) 15.4 '84 cutlass 355 rocket (the toy) grave yard: 98 gt vert 92 ranger 2.3 (resurrected with a vengeance!) 86 buick century station wagon 92 buick regal