StreetStangs.net  

Go Back   StreetStangs.net > Technical > Chassis, Drivetrain, Suspension, Brakes & Tires
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-30-2005, 08:59 PM   #1
slvrbullit
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: on the water
Posts: 1,280
Want better 60's

This is the current set up I am running as of right now....

Eibach Drag Springs w/ RR airbag at 15psi
Lakewood 70/30 struts up front
No front Sway Bar
Lakewood 50/50 rear shock
No Rear sway bar

This set up has improved my 60's .2's both N/A and on the N2O.

My previous set up was....
Eibach Lowering springs and stock shocks and sruts.


Just thought I would post this for those that dont like their 60's with a lowering suspension.

Future suspension mods are a Tubular K-member and Rear Anti-roll Bar and Battle Boxes.
__________________
2012 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited--- too many mods to list, about to be sitting on 1 ton axles.

2000 Ford F-350 Dually Lariat LE Crew Cab Short Box
7.3 auto 168,000 miles
slvrbullit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2005, 09:45 PM   #2
96GTS
Mine's bigger...
 
96GTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,060
Send a message via AIM to 96GTS
Re: Want better 60's

What control arms do you have?

you're running slikcs, right? Get those TQ boxes welded up asap
__________________
323rwhp | 320rwtq - 4VNA
12.13 @ 113.36 | 1.63 60'
96GTS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2005, 09:39 PM   #3
slvrbullit
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: on the water
Posts: 1,280
Re: Want better 60's

I am running UPR upper and lower control arms, as for the torque boxes, mine look just the same as they did when she rolled of the assembly line except for some light rusted areas. My theory on the torque box issue is that if you run an aftermarket lower and stock upper then you will have problems due to the different flex geometry in the two parts.

I have either run completely stock setup back there or totally aftermarket and I ahve had not one problem. There are 3 people that I know that have aftermarket lowers and stock uppers and all three of them have had to weld up their torque boxes.

I have been running this way for over 5 years with either drag radials or slicks.
__________________
2012 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited--- too many mods to list, about to be sitting on 1 ton axles.

2000 Ford F-350 Dually Lariat LE Crew Cab Short Box
7.3 auto 168,000 miles
slvrbullit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2005, 10:41 AM   #4
Italian LX
Daddy x4 ...we're done
 
Italian LX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Oxford, AL
Posts: 11,551
Re: Want better 60's

Quote:
Originally Posted by slvrbullit
My theory on the torque box issue is that if you run an aftermarket lower and stock upper then you will have problems due to the different flex geometry in the two parts.

I have either run completely stock setup back there or totally aftermarket and I ahve had not one problem. There are 3 people that I know that have aftermarket lowers and stock uppers and all three of them have had to weld up their torque boxes.


That is the exact reason why I suggest people to always buy both uppers and lowers at one time, or none at all.
__________________
-Brian

'86 Mustang GT Convertible
'88 Mustang LX coupe
'11 Odyssey TE
'21 Insight Touring
Italian LX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2005, 06:24 PM   #5
Evil_Capri
Senior Member
 
Evil_Capri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 149
Re: Want better 60's

Quote:
Originally Posted by Italian LX


That is the exact reason why I suggest people to always buy both uppers and lowers at one time, or none at all.
In your oponion, does it matter if the stock uppers are newer? For example my car only has ~8500 miles, and I am about ready to start compiling suspension components, and have heard/read that an adjustable LCA on a newer car doesn't necessarily need upper control arms.
Evil_Capri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2005, 06:44 PM   #6
QWKSNKE
3v's are slow
 
QWKSNKE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Here and There
Posts: 17,152
Re: Want better 60's

I think you should get uppers at the same time.
__________________
2009 Porsche Carrera S
2008 ///AMG C63.. Eurocharge Tune. RIP
2019 AMG GLC43..wife's
03 F250 SD.. Edge Evo, AFE Stage 1 CAI
08 GT. JBA axle back, FRPP springs, FRPP swaybars.. daughter's
01 Cobra vert... wife's

I need a new toy
QWKSNKE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2005, 06:45 PM   #7
TheJeanyus
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 14,774
Re: Want better 60's

Quote:
Originally Posted by QWKSNKE
I think you should get uppers at the same time.
Even though your car is newer, it's still a fox chassis. There's no real difference in your suspension and Tommy's or Brian's.
__________________
1998 Mustang GT Coupe - World's Slowest Racecar
2005 Toyota 4Runner SR5 V8
2013 Volkswagen Jetta Sportwagen TDI
TheJeanyus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2005, 07:20 PM   #8
Italian LX
Daddy x4 ...we're done
 
Italian LX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Oxford, AL
Posts: 11,551
Re: Want better 60's

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil_Capri
In your oponion, does it matter if the stock uppers are newer? For example my car only has ~8500 miles, and I am about ready to start compiling suspension components, and have heard/read that an adjustable LCA on a newer car doesn't necessarily need upper control arms.
It has nothing to do with the "newness" of the bushing; it has to do with the different material used. If you replace the lowers with stiffer aftermarket bushings, then the stock bushings (even new ones) will flex more and cause the axle to move under lauches. When this happens, the stiffer lower bushings (attached to the frame) don't give and put additional strain on the torques boxes and eventually rip them apart.

You really need to do both upper and lower control arms at the same time and also be sure to use similar type bushings for both.
__________________
-Brian

'86 Mustang GT Convertible
'88 Mustang LX coupe
'11 Odyssey TE
'21 Insight Touring
Italian LX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2005, 07:37 PM   #9
Evil_Capri
Senior Member
 
Evil_Capri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 149
Re: Want better 60's

Quote:
Originally Posted by Italian LX
It has nothing to do with the "newness" of the bushing; it has to do with the different material used. If you replace the lowers with stiffer aftermarket bushings, then the stock bushings (even new ones) will flex more and cause the axle to move under lauches. When this happens, the stiffer lower bushings (attached to the frame) don't give and put additional strain on the torques boxes and eventually rip them apart.

You really need to do both upper and lower control arms at the same time and also be sure to use similar type bushings for both.
Makes sense to me, mose abuse would seem to cause the stock upper to loose their effectiveness that must faster (especially as you pointed out with different materials) which would mean getting aftermarket uppers in the future anyway so why not have a matching pair. Thanks all for your input.
Evil_Capri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2005, 07:46 PM   #10
Italian LX
Daddy x4 ...we're done
 
Italian LX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Oxford, AL
Posts: 11,551
Re: Want better 60's

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil_Capri
Thanks all for your input.
No problem; that's what this board is for. Feel free to throw out any more questions you may have.
__________________
-Brian

'86 Mustang GT Convertible
'88 Mustang LX coupe
'11 Odyssey TE
'21 Insight Touring
Italian LX is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.