Lets start a load value thread - Page 7

wldtang · 09-05-2005, 03:11 PM

In this case would I change displacement to 172 ci? It seems I should go the opposite direction.

exgmguy · 09-10-2005, 06:51 PM

My car was idling at 35%, and would hit 100% with a very small amount of throttle. I think this was causing a part throttle rich condition. I added to the sea level function, and changed my cubic inches (in Scalars) to 351. My load at idle went down to the mid 20's.
My laptop battery died so that is as far as I got today.

Dale McPeters · 09-11-2005, 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by exgmguy

My car was idling at 35%, and would hit 100% with a very small amount of throttle. I think this was causing a part throttle rich condition. I added to the sea level function, and changed my cubic inches (in Scalars) to 351. My load at idle went down to the mid 20's.
My laptop battery died so that is as far as I got today.

Use the sea level load scaling and save the cubic inch displacement for when it is really needed........like higher psi of boost.

Note this is MHO.....YMMV.

09-05-2005, 03:11 PM	#61
wldtang Junior Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 3	Re: Lets start a load value thread In this case would I change displacement to 172 ci? It seems I should go the opposite direction. __________________ 94 Cobra (white with black cloth) Vortech V2 SQ, 3" head pulley, AFM pipe, 42's, Pro M 80, Longtubes, MSD 6Al and coil, X pipe, Spintech catback, 3.73's, 18" saleens, C springs, Tremec TKO, Spec Stage 1, Tweecer RT, and other odds and ins

09-10-2005, 06:51 PM	#62
exgmguy Junior Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 6	Re: Lets start a load value thread My car was idling at 35%, and would hit 100% with a very small amount of throttle. I think this was causing a part throttle rich condition. I added to the sea level function, and changed my cubic inches (in Scalars) to 351. My load at idle went down to the mid 20's. My laptop battery died so that is as far as I got today.