StreetStangs.net  

Go Back   StreetStangs.net > Technical > Ford Pushrod Tech (5.0 & 5.8)
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-15-2006, 06:38 PM   #1
natedawgg94
Senior Member
 
natedawgg94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ohatchee, AL
Posts: 713
.648 lift on a stock bottom end

was just scooping through the corral forums and there's a guy with a '95 with stock bottom end using a .648 lift cam just gotta say DAMN that thing has got to sound freaking wicked. anyone know of anyone around here with that much or close to it on a stock bottom end? he is also running tw trach heat heads.
__________________

1994 Cobra Pace Car #365 of 1000 light mods

1994 mustang GT 3.55's, 331 stroker, 75mm tb, 75mm maf, mac h pipe SOLD (ole yella u will be missed ((>>.



Rubbing Is Racing
natedawgg94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 06:40 PM   #2
QWKSNKE
3v's are slow
 
QWKSNKE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Here and There
Posts: 17,152
Re: .648 lift on a stock bottom end

there is no way
__________________
2009 Porsche Carrera S
2008 ///AMG C63.. Eurocharge Tune. RIP
2019 AMG GLC43..wife's
03 F250 SD.. Edge Evo, AFE Stage 1 CAI
08 GT. JBA axle back, FRPP springs, FRPP swaybars.. daughter's
01 Cobra vert... wife's

I need a new toy
QWKSNKE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 06:54 PM   #3
jwillburn119
Senior Member
 
jwillburn119's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: temple, tx
Posts: 240
Send a message via Yahoo to jwillburn119
Re: .648 lift on a stock bottom end

and yall are pissy about my measly .544...
__________________
Whats in your WALLET?
jwillburn119 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 06:56 PM   #4
natedawgg94
Senior Member
 
natedawgg94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ohatchee, AL
Posts: 713
Re: .648 lift on a stock bottom end

from what everyone else has posted i thought so myself but they say if you do a 4 degree advance and have the lobe separation right it will work. the guy is running it now. they got in a pissing constest bout it pretty interesting what a lot of guys are saying should check it out it is under 94/95.
__________________

1994 Cobra Pace Car #365 of 1000 light mods

1994 mustang GT 3.55's, 331 stroker, 75mm tb, 75mm maf, mac h pipe SOLD (ole yella u will be missed ((>>.



Rubbing Is Racing
natedawgg94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 07:20 PM   #5
jwillburn119
Senior Member
 
jwillburn119's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: temple, tx
Posts: 240
Send a message via Yahoo to jwillburn119
Re: .648 lift on a stock bottom end

man i cant find it... i tried and checked like 3 pages... where is it?
__________________
Whats in your WALLET?
jwillburn119 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 07:39 PM   #6
Disney Lincoln
Senior Member
 
Disney Lincoln's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 290
Re: .648 lift on a stock bottom end

If yo notch the stock pistons you can do that. No way to do it otherwise. I've been down that road more than a dozen times. No amount of advance or retard will get the valve off the slug with that much lift (and duration that would go along with that kind of lift).
Disney Lincoln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 11:06 PM   #7
LeeH
Senior Member
 
LeeH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The conservative underground
Posts: 341
Re: .648 lift on a stock bottom end

Well I agree that .648 aint gonna happen on the intake side with a stock piston unless you have real lazy ramps or retard the cam timming alot, This is gonna equal big no on second thought huge turd! Most of the Twisted Wedge V/P interference occurs due to steep ramps and duration above 226* at .050, Also you see very few hydraulic rollers over .600 lift. Most are solid flat tappet and solid roller cams The ramp rates on both of these cams would not allow for the use of a .648 lift with a stock piston, My old 95GT with a set of TFS TW heads and a Comp Cams XE270HR14 218/226 .514/.514 114 only had .070 on the intake but well over .200 on the exhaust(V/P clearance).

This story is kinda similar to those we all have heard about 9 and 10 second daily driven street cars that when we finally see them run cant click off a 13.

"Never beleive any of what you hear and only half of what you see"
LeeH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2006, 02:12 AM   #8
One_live95
Senior Member
 
One_live95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dothan
Posts: 617
Send a message via MSN to One_live95
Re: .648 lift on a stock bottom end

__________________
this-n-that, always wanting more....lol
One_live95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2006, 04:58 AM   #9
natedawgg94
Senior Member
 
natedawgg94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ohatchee, AL
Posts: 713
Re: .648 lift on a stock bottom end

http://www.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?t=758474 theres the link guys if you wanna check it out.
__________________

1994 Cobra Pace Car #365 of 1000 light mods

1994 mustang GT 3.55's, 331 stroker, 75mm tb, 75mm maf, mac h pipe SOLD (ole yella u will be missed ((>>.



Rubbing Is Racing
natedawgg94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2006, 05:05 AM   #10
natedawgg94
Senior Member
 
natedawgg94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ohatchee, AL
Posts: 713
Re: .648 lift on a stock bottom end

personally i'm one of those see it believe it types but still find the thought interesting. one thing when i seen this guys post was he is running a 12.07 1/4 and has 331rwhp with no power adder. i also dont see why anyone would want that much lift on a daily driver anyway.
__________________

1994 Cobra Pace Car #365 of 1000 light mods

1994 mustang GT 3.55's, 331 stroker, 75mm tb, 75mm maf, mac h pipe SOLD (ole yella u will be missed ((>>.



Rubbing Is Racing
natedawgg94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.