Ordered my quarter horse last night - Page 2

BIGDATOWN · 04-22-2011, 01:24 PM

I have not gotten that yet. But I also dont even know how to use it yet either lol I have a friend of mine coming down in the morning to help get me going and atleast learn how to operate it, and then ill let the EA analize it for it.

ncontt · 08-14-2011, 08:24 AM

Dale and Big, I got one on the way as well....should be here by mid-week.....the prospect of paying for retunes (I'm kinda fickle and I have a tendency to have stuff break on me...lol) was not very appealing so I'm thinking this route may be the way to go for me...besides what is another 2 years before I can drive it???? me--->

<---me

QWKSNKE · 08-14-2011, 03:13 PM

Can I make this work on my old SVO?

ncontt · 08-14-2011, 03:40 PM

not sure...is there a J3 port on it?

BIGDATOWN · 08-14-2011, 04:50 PM

I actually sold my setup because I am putting my car back factory. You can do whatever you want with the software. And yes the QH will work with any eec processor prior to 05-up. I liked everything about it and would have loved it more if I didnt own a 95 car. Any other car and it will be gravy!

ncontt · 08-14-2011, 07:12 PM

ya, from what I gather the 94/95's are bastards to tune, mine will basically be a 87-93 mustang, albeit a 4 door mustang :grin:, I just ordered a Innovate LC-1 wideband to stick in the provided 3rd bung in my downpipe so I'm looking forward to this...

RedSuperRanger23 · 08-14-2011, 07:44 PM

what is it about the 94/95's that makes them difficult to tune?

BIGDATOWN · 08-14-2011, 08:21 PM

There amount of control in the computer means it has to be way more in depth tuned. There is about twice the parameters to change versus the a9l/p

Dale McPeters · 08-15-2011, 08:17 PM

The 94/95 cars are more load based when tuning... Where as the '88-'93 foxbodys were more rpm based. If you do not get the Mass Air Flow Meter setup correctly on the '94-'95 cars you will have a he'll of a time getting the tune dialed in... They are not any worse than the '96 up mustangs when it comes to tuning them IMHO.
Although the '88-'93 foxbodys are easier to tune...

BIGDATOWN · 08-15-2011, 08:24 PM

Thanks dale. Thats what I was trying to say lol Getting the mass transfer setup correctly is super tough to me. But I am also not a tuner.

08-14-2011, 08:24 AM	#12
ncontt pro-jackstand racer Join Date: May 2005 Location: Milner, Ga Posts: 2,473	Dale and Big, I got one on the way as well....should be here by mid-week.....the prospect of paying for retunes (I'm kinda fickle and I have a tendency to have stuff break on me...lol) was not very appealing so I'm thinking this route may be the way to go for me...besides what is another 2 years before I can drive it???? me---><---me __________________ And God created Neil Peart so that lightning would make sense to the world. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

08-14-2011, 03:13 PM	#13
QWKSNKE 3v's are slow Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Here and There Posts: 17,152	Can I make this work on my old SVO? __________________ 2009 Porsche Carrera S 2008 ///AMG C63.. Eurocharge Tune. RIP 2019 AMG GLC43..wife's 03 F250 SD.. Edge Evo, AFE Stage 1 CAI 08 GT. JBA axle back, FRPP springs, FRPP swaybars.. daughter's 01 Cobra vert... wife's I need a new toy

08-14-2011, 03:40 PM	#14
ncontt pro-jackstand racer Join Date: May 2005 Location: Milner, Ga Posts: 2,473	not sure...is there a J3 port on it? __________________ And God created Neil Peart so that lightning would make sense to the world. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

08-14-2011, 07:12 PM	#16
ncontt pro-jackstand racer Join Date: May 2005 Location: Milner, Ga Posts: 2,473	ya, from what I gather the 94/95's are bastards to tune, mine will basically be a 87-93 mustang, albeit a 4 door mustang :grin:, I just ordered a Innovate LC-1 wideband to stick in the provided 3rd bung in my downpipe so I'm looking forward to this... __________________ And God created Neil Peart so that lightning would make sense to the world. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

08-14-2011, 07:44 PM	#17
RedSuperRanger23 Gizmo Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Gardendale, Al Posts: 272	what is it about the 94/95's that makes them difficult to tune? __________________ 94 Mustang GT 89 Ranger XLT 96 F150 XLT 04 Crown Vic

04-22-2011, 01:24 PM	#11
BIGDATOWN Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 221	I have not gotten that yet. But I also dont even know how to use it yet either lol I have a friend of mine coming down in the morning to help get me going and atleast learn how to operate it, and then ill let the EA analize it for it.

08-14-2011, 04:50 PM	#15
BIGDATOWN Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 221	I actually sold my setup because I am putting my car back factory. You can do whatever you want with the software. And yes the QH will work with any eec processor prior to 05-up. I liked everything about it and would have loved it more if I didnt own a 95 car. Any other car and it will be gravy!

08-14-2011, 08:21 PM	#18
BIGDATOWN Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 221	There amount of control in the computer means it has to be way more in depth tuned. There is about twice the parameters to change versus the a9l/p

08-15-2011, 08:17 PM	#19
Dale McPeters 5.0 Block/Walnut Cracker Join Date: May 2005 Location: Working.... Posts: 2,409	The 94/95 cars are more load based when tuning... Where as the '88-'93 foxbodys were more rpm based. If you do not get the Mass Air Flow Meter setup correctly on the '94-'95 cars you will have a he'll of a time getting the tune dialed in... They are not any worse than the '96 up mustangs when it comes to tuning them IMHO. Although the '88-'93 foxbodys are easier to tune... __________________ '14 Dodge Challenger SRT8 392 6-speed

08-15-2011, 08:24 PM	#20
BIGDATOWN Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 221	Thanks dale. Thats what I was trying to say lol Getting the mass transfer setup correctly is super tough to me. But I am also not a tuner.